DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Volvo V50 vs 2005 MG TF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG TF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationMG TF
VolvoMakeMG
V50ModelTF
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationMG TF
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
109 HPPower116 HP
240 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationMG TF
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationMG TF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/55 R15; 205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationMG TF
4522 mmLength3943 mm
1845 mmWidth1630 mm
1457 mmHeight1261 mm
1416 KgWeight1095 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Volvo V50 and 2005 MG TF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG TF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…