DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Rover 25 vs 2005 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V50
RoverMakeVolvo
25ModelV50
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V50
9,5 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
138 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank52 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V50
3990 mmLength4522 mm
1688 mmWidth1845 mm
1417 mmHeight1457 mm
1105 KgWeight1416 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Rover 25 and 2005 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…