DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo V50 vs 2010 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Caddy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeVolkswagen
V50ModelCaddy
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
0 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower102 HP
150 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4875 mm
1845 mmWidth1794 mm
1457 mmHeight1834 mm
1335 KgWeight1558-1664 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase3002 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo V50 and 2010 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…