DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo V50 vs 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Lancer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
V50ModelLancer
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
0 km/hTop speed191 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
100 HPPower109 HP
150 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank59 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4570 mm
1845 mmWidth1760 mm
1457 mmHeight1505 mm
1335 KgWeight1290 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2635 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo V50 and 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Lancer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…