DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo V50 vs 2010 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 2

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 2
VolvoMakeMazda
V50Model2
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 2
12,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
100 HPPower102 HP
150 NmTorque133 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 2
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank43 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 2
4522 mmLength3920 mm
1845 mmWidth1695 mm
1457 mmHeight1475 mm
1335 KgWeight970 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo V50 and 2010 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 2 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…