DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo V40 vs 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeJeep
V40ModelGrand Cherokee
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

6,1 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
250 km/hTop speed202 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
254 HPPower250 HP
360 NmTorque570 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank93 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
—Tyre size265/60 R18; 265/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4369 mmLength4828 mm
1783 mmWidth1943 mm
1420 mmHeight1802 mm
1574 KgWeight2403-2522 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2915 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo V40 and 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…