DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs 2013 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JeepMakeVolvo
Grand CherokeeModelV40
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
202 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
250 HPPower254 HP
570 NmTorque360 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
93 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8Gears6
265/60 R18; 265/50 R20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4828 mmLength4369 mm
1943 mmWidth1783 mm
1802 mmHeight1420 mm
2403-2522 KgWeight1574 Kg
2915 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee and 2013 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…