2016 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 2.0 T2 (122 Hp) 2016Overall Score65.25/100
2016 Volvo V40 vs 2016 Citroen Jumpy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Citroen
Jumpy
Citroen Jumpy 2.0 HDi (128 Hp) 2016Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen Jumpy
VolvoMakeCitroen
V40ModelJumpy
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats9
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen Jumpy
9,8 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
190 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
122 HPPower128 HP
220 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen Jumpy
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen Jumpy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen Jumpy
4369 mmLength4805 mm
1857 mmWidth1895 mm
1439 mmHeight1942 mm
—Weight1913 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Volvo V40 and 2016 Citroen Jumpy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…