2016 • Ford
S-Max
Ford S-Max 2.0 TDCi (120 Hp) 2016Overall Score64.5/100
2016 Ford S-Max vs 2016 Volvo V40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 2.0 T2 (122 Hp) 2016Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford S-MaxSpecificationVolvo V40
FordMakeVolvo
S-MaxModelV40
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford S-MaxSpecificationVolvo V40
13,4 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
183 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
120 HPPower122 HP
310 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford S-MaxSpecificationVolvo V40
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,0 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford S-MaxSpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford S-MaxSpecificationVolvo V40
4796 mmLength4369 mm
1916 mmWidth1857 mm
1953 mmHeight1439 mm
1725 KgWeight—
2849 mmWheelbase2647 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford S-Max and 2016 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…