2016 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score72.75/100
2016 Volvo V40 vs 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Land Rover
Range Rover Evoque
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Range 2.0 TD4 (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score72.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
VolvoMakeLand Rover
V40ModelRange Rover Evoque
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV, Crossover
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
8,4 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
210 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
DieselFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank54 lt
4,0 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 GeartronicGears6
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
4369 mmLength4371 mm
1783 mmWidth1985 mm
1439 mmHeight1660 mm
1486 KgWeight1608 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Volvo V40 and 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…