DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2016 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeVolvo
Range Rover EvoqueModelV40
2016Model year2016
SUV, CrossoverBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
182 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
54 ltFuel tank62 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption4,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 Geartronic
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4371 mmLength4369 mm
1985 mmWidth1783 mm
1660 mmHeight1439 mm
1608 KgWeight1486 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2016 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…