2000 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.9 D (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score57.25/100
2000 Volvo V40 vs 2000 Mazda MX-6 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
MX-6
Mazda MX-6 2.0 i 16V (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationMazda MX-6
VolvoMakeMazda
V40ModelMX-6
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationMazda MX-6
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
195 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
265 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationMazda MX-6
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,3 ltAverage consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationMazda MX-6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15; 205/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R14 88 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationMazda MX-6
4516 mmLength4615 mm
1716 mmWidth1750 mm
1425 mmHeight1310 mm
1320 KgWeight1120 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volvo V40 and 2000 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…