2003 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.9 D (102 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
2003 Volvo V40 vs 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 16V GDI (122 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
V40ModelCarisma
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
12,0 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
102 HPPower122 HP
215 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4516 mmLength4475 mm
1716 mmWidth1710 mm
1425 mmHeight1405 mm
1320 KgWeight1215 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Volvo V40 and 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…