DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2003 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
CarismaModelV40
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
122 HPPower102 HP
174 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength4516 mm
1710 mmWidth1716 mm
1405 mmHeight1425 mm
1215 KgWeight1320 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2003 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…