DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volvo V40 vs 2002 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationRover 25
VolvoMakeRover
V40Model25
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationRover 25
10,5 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
122 HPPower117 HP
174 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption11,6 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/65 R15Tyre size185/55 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationRover 25
4516 mmLength3990 mm
1716 mmWidth1688 mm
1425 mmHeight1419 mm
1260 KgWeight1135 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volvo V40 and 2002 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…