DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Rover 25 vs 2002 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V40
RoverMakeVolvo
25ModelV40
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V40
9,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
117 HPPower122 HP
160 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/55 R15 HTyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V40
3990 mmLength4516 mm
1688 mmWidth1716 mm
1419 mmHeight1425 mm
1135 KgWeight1260 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Rover 25 and 2002 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…