2002 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.8 GDI (122 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
2002 Volvo V40 vs 2002 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.9 DI-D (102 Hp) 2002Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Carisma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
V40ModelCarisma
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
10,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
122 HPPower102 HP
174 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4516 mmLength4475 mm
1716 mmWidth1710 mm
1425 mmHeight1405 mm
1260 KgWeight1265 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Volvo V40 and 2002 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…