DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Volvo V40 vs 2002 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 323
VolvoMakeMazda
V40Model323
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 323
10,5 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
200 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
122 HPPower114 HP
174 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 323
4516 mmLength4315 mm
1716 mmWidth1705 mm
1425 mmHeight1410 mm
1260 KgWeight1125 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Volvo V40 and 2002 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…