DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo V40 vs 2012 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo C30
VolvoMakeVolvo
V40ModelC30
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo C30
8,5 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
225 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
180 HPPower177 HP
240 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo C30
4369 mmLength4266 mm
1802 mmWidth1782 mm
1445 mmHeight1447 mm
1297 KgWeight1451 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo V40 and 2012 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…