DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo C30 vs 2012 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationVolvo V40
VolvoMakeVolvo
C30ModelV40
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationVolvo V40
8,6 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
0 km/hTop speed225 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
177 HPPower180 HP
400 NmTorque240 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationVolvo V40
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,0 ltUrban consumption—
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationVolvo V40
4266 mmLength4369 mm
1782 mmWidth1802 mm
1447 mmHeight1445 mm
1451 KgWeight1297 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo C30 and 2012 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…