DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo V40 vs 2013 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationFiat Bravo
VolvoMakeFiat
V40ModelBravo
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationFiat Bravo
8,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
210 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
150 HPPower120 HP
240 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationFiat Bravo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank58 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationFiat Bravo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
205/55 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationFiat Bravo
4369 mmLength4336 mm
1802 mmWidth1792 mm
1445 mmHeight1498 mm
1268 KgWeight1295 kg
—Luggage capacity400 lt
2647 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Volvo V40

No additional feature records are available.

Fiat BravoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy Wheels

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo V40 and 2013 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…