DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Fiat Bravo vs 2013 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Bravo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

69.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo V40
FiatMakeVolvo
BravoModelV40
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo V40
10,5 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
195 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
120 HPPower150 HP
300 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo V40
DieselFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank62 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Fiat BravoSpecificationVolvo V40
4336 mmLength4369 mm
1792 mmWidth1802 mm
1498 mmHeight1445 mm
1295 kgWeight1268 Kg
400 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2647 mm

Additional Features

Fiat BravoDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagABSEBDESPTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy Wheels
Volvo V40

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Fiat Bravo and 2013 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Bravo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…