DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo V40 vs 2012 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationNissan AD
VolvoMakeNissan
V40ModelAD
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationNissan AD
12,3 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
115 HPPower109 HP
270 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank41 lt
4,0 ltUrban consumption—
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationNissan AD
4369 mmLength4395 mm
1802 mmWidth1695 mm
1445 mmHeight1500 mm
1257 KgWeight—
2647 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo V40 and 2012 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…