DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan AD vs 2012 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V40
NissanMakeVolvo
ADModelV40
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V40
—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower115 HP
148 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V40
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption4,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,4 lt
—Average consumption3,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V40
4395 mmLength4369 mm
1695 mmWidth1802 mm
1500 mmHeight1445 mm
—Weight1257 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan AD and 2012 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…