DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo V40 vs 2012 Honda CR-Z Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda CR-Z
VolvoMakeHonda
V40ModelCR-Z
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda CR-Z
12,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
190 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
115 HPPower114 HP
270 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda CR-Z
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
4,0 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
3,6 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda CR-Z
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda CR-Z
4369 mmLength4078 mm
1802 mmWidth2013 mm
1445 mmHeight1395 mm
1257 KgWeight1147 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2435 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo V40 and 2012 Honda CR-Z approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…