DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo V40 vs 2016 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
V40ModelScenic
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1600 cc
152 HPPower160 HP
250 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 EDC
—Tyre size195/55 R20 95H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4369 mmLength4634 mm
1857 mmWidth1866 mm
1439 mmHeight1660 mm
—Weight1644/1660 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2804 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo V40 and 2016 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…