DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Scenic vs 2016 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
ScenicModelV40
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5/7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1600 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
160 HPPower152 HP
380 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank62 lt
5,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,7 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 EDCGears6
195/55 R20 95HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4634 mmLength4369 mm
1866 mmWidth1857 mm
1660 mmHeight1439 mm
1644/1660 KgWeight—
2804 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Scenic and 2016 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…