DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo V40 vs 2016 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda FIT
VolvoMakeHonda
V40ModelFIT
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda FIT
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
122 HPPower132 HP
220 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda FIT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank40 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda FIT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size185/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda FIT
4369 mmLength3955 mm
1857 mmWidth1695 mm
1439 mmHeight1525 mm
—Weight1050 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo V40 and 2016 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…