DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Honda FIT vs 2016 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo V40
HondaMakeVolvo
FITModelV40
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo V40
—0–100 km/h9,8 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
132 HPPower122 HP
155 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo V40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Average consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
185/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationVolvo V40
3955 mmLength4369 mm
1695 mmWidth1857 mm
1525 mmHeight1439 mm
1050 KgWeight—
2530 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Honda FIT and 2016 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…