2016 • Volvo
S90
Volvo S90 2.0 D4 (190 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
2016 Volvo S90 vs 2016 BMW 4 Serisi Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • BMW
4 Serisi
BMW 4 Serisi 2016Overall Score75.5/100
WINNER
Volvo S90
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S90SpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
VolvoMakeBMW
S90Model4 Serisi
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Volvo S90SpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
8,2 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
230 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
190 HPPower184 HP
400 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S90SpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S90SpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R17; 245/45 R18; 255/40 R19; 255/35 R20Tyre size225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S90SpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
4963 mmLength4638 mm
1879 mmWidth1825 mm
1443 mmHeight1384 mm
—Weight1700 Kg
2941 mmWheelbase2810 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Volvo S90 and 2016 BMW 4 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…