DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 BMW 4 Serisi vs 2016 Volvo S90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S90

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeVolvo
4 SerisiModelS90
2016Model year2016
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
230 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
184 HPPower190 HP
270 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,2 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19Tyre size225/55 R17; 245/45 R18; 255/40 R19; 255/35 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4638 mmLength4963 mm
1825 mmWidth1879 mm
1384 mmHeight1443 mm
1700 KgWeight—
2810 mmWheelbase2941 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 BMW 4 Serisi and 2016 Volvo S90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S90 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…