DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo S90 vs 2016 Fiat Toro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S90SpecificationFiat Toro
VolvoMakeFiat
S90ModelToro
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo S90SpecificationFiat Toro
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
190 HPPower170 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S90SpecificationFiat Toro
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S90SpecificationFiat Toro
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R17; 245/45 R18; 255/40 R19; 255/35 R20Tyre size225/70 R16; 225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S90SpecificationFiat Toro
4963 mmLength4915 mm
1879 mmWidth1844 mm
1443 mmHeight1746 mm
—Weight1709 Kg
2941 mmWheelbase2990 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo S90 and 2016 Fiat Toro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…