2000 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.9 24V (200 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
2000 Volvo S80 vs 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Challenger
Mitsubishi Challenger 3.0 i V6 24V (185 Hp) 2000Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Challenger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S80SpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
S80ModelChallenger
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S80SpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2922 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
200 HPPower185 HP
280 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S80SpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank74 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption16 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S80SpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
215/55R16Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S80SpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
4822 mmLength4530 mm
1832 mmWidth1775 mm
1434 mmHeight1730 mm
1530 KgWeight1830 Kg
2791 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volvo S80 and 2000 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…