DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Elgrand vs 2000 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
ElgrandModelS80
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeSedan
8Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
0 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2953 ccEngine displacement2922 cc
170 HPPower200 HP
353 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size215/55R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4740 mmLength4822 mm
1775 mmWidth1832 mm
1940 mmHeight1434 mm
2060 KgWeight1530 Kg
2900 mmWheelbase2791 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Elgrand and 2000 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…