2005 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 (272 Hp) 2005Overall Score82.5/100
2005 Volvo S80 vs 2004 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0 i V6 24V (280 Hp) 2004Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
Volvo S80
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S80SpecificationNissan Cedric
VolvoMakeNissan
S80ModelCedric
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S80SpecificationNissan Cedric
7,2 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2783 ccEngine displacement2987 cc
272 HPPower280 HP
380 NmTorque387 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S80SpecificationNissan Cedric
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
16,6 ltUrban consumption18 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
12,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S80SpecificationNissan Cedric
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
225/50 R17Tyre size205/60 R16 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S80SpecificationNissan Cedric
4822 mmLength4860 mm
1832 mmWidth1770 mm
1434 mmHeight1450 mm
1630 KgWeight1660 Kg
2791 mmWheelbase2800 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Volvo S80 and 2004 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…