2004 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0 i V6 24V (280 Hp) 2004Overall Score81.75/100
2004 Nissan Cedric vs 2005 Volvo S80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.8 24V T6 (272 Hp) 2005Overall Score82.5/100
WINNER
Volvo S80
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo S80
NissanMakeVolvo
CedricModelS80
2004Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo S80
—0–100 km/h7,2 s
220 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement2783 cc
280 HPPower272 HP
387 NmTorque380 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo S80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank80 lt
18 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption12,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo S80
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/60 R16 HTyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo S80
4860 mmLength4822 mm
1770 mmWidth1832 mm
1450 mmHeight1434 mm
1660 KgWeight1630 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2791 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Nissan Cedric and 2005 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…