2006 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.4 i 20V (170 Hp) 2006Overall Score68.5/100
2006 Volvo S80 vs 2006 Ford Ranger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 TDCi (143 Hp) 2006Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Volvo S80
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S80SpecificationFord Ranger
VolvoMakeFord
S80ModelRanger
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S80SpecificationFord Ranger
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
170 HPPower143 HP
230 NmTorque330 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S80SpecificationFord Ranger
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S80SpecificationFord Ranger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15; 245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S80SpecificationFord Ranger
4822 mmLength5075 mm
1832 mmWidth1805 mm
1434 mmHeight1745 mm
1470 KgWeight—
2791 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Volvo S80 and 2006 Ford Ranger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…