2003 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.0 T (163 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Volvo S80 vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi (136 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Volvo S80
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S80SpecificationFord C-Max
VolvoMakeFord
S80ModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S80SpecificationFord C-Max
9,2 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
220 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
163 HPPower136 HP
230 NmTorque320 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S80SpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,4 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S80SpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S80SpecificationFord C-Max
4820 mmLength4330 mm
1830 mmWidth1820 mm
1440 mmHeight1600 mm
1500 KgWeight1391 Kg
2790 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Volvo S80 and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…