DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo S80
FordMakeVolvo
C-MaxModelS80
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo S80
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
136 HPPower163 HP
320 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo S80
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo S80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford C-MaxSpecificationVolvo S80
4330 mmLength4820 mm
1820 mmWidth1830 mm
1600 mmHeight1440 mm
1391 KgWeight1500 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2790 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…