DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo S80 vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 3
VolvoMakeMazda
S80Model3
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 3
9,7 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
0 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
163 HPPower165 HP
400 NmTorque210 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 3
4851 mmLength4460 mm
1861 mmWidth1795 mm
1493 mmHeight1450 mm
1612 KgWeight1220 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo S80 and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…