DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo S80
MazdaMakeVolvo
3ModelS80
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo S80
8,2 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
210 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
165 HPPower163 HP
210 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo S80
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo S80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/45 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo S80
4460 mmLength4851 mm
1795 mmWidth1861 mm
1450 mmHeight1493 mm
1220 KgWeight1612 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…