DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo S80 vs 2013 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S80SpecificationFord Kuga
VolvoMakeFord
S80ModelKuga
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S80SpecificationFord Kuga
9,7 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
400 NmTorque340 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S80SpecificationFord Kuga
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S80SpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S80SpecificationFord Kuga
4851 mmLength4524 mm
1861 mmWidth1838 mm
1493 mmHeight1701 mm
1612 KgWeight1692 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo S80 and 2013 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…