2012 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.0 D3 (163 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
2012 Volvo S80 vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.0 (165 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-5
VolvoMakeMazda
S80ModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-5
9,7 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
163 HPPower165 HP
400 NmTorque210 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank56 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-5
4851 mmLength4555 mm
1861 mmWidth1840 mm
1493 mmHeight1710 mm
1612 KgWeight1411 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S80 and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…