DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Ford Kuga vs 2012 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S80
FordMakeVolvo
KugaModelS80
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S80
9,9 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
340 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S80
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S80
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S80
4524 mmLength4851 mm
1838 mmWidth1861 mm
1701 mmHeight1493 mm
1692 KgWeight1612 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Ford Kuga and 2012 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…