DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo S80 vs 2016 Ford KA Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S80SpecificationFord KA
VolvoMakeFord
S80ModelKA
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo S80SpecificationFord KA
11,5 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
115 HPPower110 HP
270 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S80SpecificationFord KA
DieselFuel typePetrol / Ethanol – E85
70 ltFuel tank51 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S80SpecificationFord KA
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size175/65 R14; 195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S80SpecificationFord KA
4854 mmLength4254 mm
1907 mmWidth1695 mm
1493 mmHeight1460 mm
1629 KgWeight1032 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo S80 and 2016 Ford KA approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…