DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford KA vs 2016 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationVolvo S80
FordMakeVolvo
KAModelS80
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Ford KASpecificationVolvo S80
—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
146 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationVolvo S80
Petrol / Ethanol – E85Fuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationVolvo S80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/65 R14; 195/55 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationVolvo S80
4254 mmLength4854 mm
1695 mmWidth1907 mm
1460 mmHeight1493 mm
1032 KgWeight1629 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford KA and 2016 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…