DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Volvo S70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeVolvo
Range RoverModelS70
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2461 cc
136 HPPower140 HP
270 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
100 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption9 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size190/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4720 mm
1853 mmWidth1760 mm
1817 mmHeight1400 mm
2115 KgWeight1510 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Volvo S70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…