2004 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.5i 20V R (300 Hp) 2004Overall Score82.5/100
2004 Volvo S60 vs 2002 Toyota Mark II Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Toyota
Mark II
Toyota Mark II 2.5 i 24V Turbo WT-I (280 Hp) 2002Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
Volvo S60
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S60SpecificationToyota Mark II
VolvoMakeToyota
S60ModelMark II
2004Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S60SpecificationToyota Mark II
5,7 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2492 cc
300 HPPower280 HP
400 NmTorque378 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S60SpecificationToyota Mark II
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption20 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption12 lt
10,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S60SpecificationToyota Mark II
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/45 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S60SpecificationToyota Mark II
4606 mmLength4735 mm
1804 mmWidth1760 mm
1428 mmHeight1460 mm
1620 KgWeight1570 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2780 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo S60 and 2002 Toyota Mark II approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…