2004 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 3.0 i V6 24V (280 Hp) 2004Overall Score81.75/100
2004 Nissan Cedric vs 2004 Volvo S60 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.5i 20V R (300 Hp) 2004Overall Score82.5/100
WINNER
Volvo S60
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo S60
NissanMakeVolvo
CedricModelS60
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo S60
—0–100 km/h5,7 s
220 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2987 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
280 HPPower300 HP
387 NmTorque400 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
18 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
11 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
—Average consumption10,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo S60
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
205/60 R16 HTyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationVolvo S60
4860 mmLength4606 mm
1770 mmWidth1804 mm
1450 mmHeight1428 mm
1660 KgWeight1620 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2715 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Nissan Cedric and 2004 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…