DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Volvo S60 vs 2014 Caterham CSR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham CSR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.75–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeCaterham
S60ModelCSR
2014Model year2014
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

7,6 s0–100 km/h3,7 s
230 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
215 HPPower200 HP
440 NmTorque221 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank42 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption16,6 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size195/45R15; 255/40 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4635 mmLength3300 mm
1899 mmWidth1685 mm
1484 mmHeight1140 mm
1680 KgWeight565 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2315 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Volvo S60 and 2014 Caterham CSR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham CSR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…